Why is 'strict scrutiny' considered a high standard of review?

Strict scrutiny is deemed a high standard of review because it mandates that the government must provide a compelling justification for any law or policy that infringes upon fundamental rights or involves suspect classifications, such as race or national origin. This standard comes into play particularly when the law in question impacts groups that are traditionally marginalized or when it affects fundamental rights asserted under the Constitution.

When the court applies strict scrutiny, it requires that the law serves a significant governmental interest and that it is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. This rigorous evaluation ensures that any infringement upon protected classes or rights is carefully scrutinized, upholding the principle that constitutional protections should be robustly defended against unwarranted government actions. Therefore, the requirement for a justifiable reason emphasizes the importance placed on safeguarding individual rights within the legal framework.